This deal was played in a team
game and at one table West routinely led the ♥K
which held the trick. Declarer ruffed the second round of Hearts and lost a
trump to East’s Ace. A Diamond was returned for West
to ruff, briefly raising the defense’s hopes. But that was all they got, and
Declarer had 10 tricks. In the post mortem West stated the obvious by pointing
out that East needed to overtake the King with his
♥A at Trick 1 and
shoot back a Diamond, getting the defense two ruffs and setting the
contract. Here is the full deal:
|
♠ JT3
♥
743
♦
J86
♣ AK87 |
|
♠ 982
♥
KQJT952
♦
♣ 963 |
Dummy
West East
Declarer |
♠ A
♥
A6
♦
T9743
♣ QJT42 |
|
♠ KQ7654
♥
8
♦
AKQ52
♣ 5 |
|
At the other table, West was made
of smarter stuff. At Trick 1 she led the Heart Two! Unless leading “top
of a sequence” it is customary to lead 4th best from a long suit
(some prefer “3rd or 5th”), so that Heart Two was
distinctly fishy-looking, considering that West’s bidding had announced 6 or 7
Hearts. What was West trying to say by her strange lead? She clearly wanted a
shift, probably for a ruff. That was a great lead, but how did East correctly
deduce that he should try to give West a Diamond ruff, not a Club ruff?
►
East’s logic was as follows:
-
If West was out of Clubs, then Declarer had four of them and East had two
natural Club tricks coming his way. If West got ruffs in that suit he would
merely be ruffing East’s slow Club winners.
-
But, if West was out of Diamonds then West would be ruffing Declarer’s
winners.
Back to Index